Hi Ramaan,
On 29 June 2016 at 17:03, Ramana Radhakrishnan
wrote:
> I'm curious about what workloads / benchmarks you considered for this
> activity - the traditional spec benchmarks don't really trigger anything in
> libatomic - so where do we see the improvements or none ?
First, let me preci
on behalf of
Yvan Roux
Sent: 27 June 2016 20:04:52
To: Pinski, Andrew
Cc: Linaro Toolchain Mailman List
Subject: Re: [ACTIVITY] Week 25
Hi Andrew,
On 27 June 2016 at 19:32, Pinski, Andrew wrote:
>>No gain expected in implementing an Ifunc'ed version of the library.
>
Hi Andrew,
On 27 June 2016 at 19:32, Pinski, Andrew wrote:
>>No gain expected in implementing an Ifunc'ed version of the library.
>
> How did you prove that? What hardware did you run this on to prove it?
> Also have you thought at least doing an ifunc version for 128bit atomics?
up to
