Re: [Activity] Week 17

2015-04-27 Thread Prathamesh Kulkarni
On 27 April 2015 at 03:17, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote: > == This Week == > * TCWG-619: > > * abe sysroot/libc issue > While building chromium with development build of toolchain on > arm-linux-gnueabihf, I get the following error: > undefined reference to clock_gettime() > Builds fine with release

Re: [ACTIVITY] Week 17

2014-04-26 Thread Renato Golin
On 26 April 2014 01:13, Kugan wrote: > What is AArch64 vs. ARM64. Is that something specific to LLVM? Yes, they're two different AArch64 back-ends, and are being merged into one official. AArch64 is the one created by Tim at ARM and was feature complete, while ARM64 is the one created by Apple an

Re: [ACTIVITY] Week 17

2014-04-25 Thread Kugan
On 26/04/14 03:08, Renato Golin wrote: > == Progress == > > * Holidays (3 days) > - Clearing emails/tasks backlog > - Some post-trip illness > > * AArch64 vs. ARM64 > - Comparing performance of both back-ends What is AArch64 vs. ARM64. Is that something specific to LLVM? Thanks, Kugan > >

Re: [Activity] Week 17

2012-04-29 Thread Michael Hope
On 28 April 2012 21:34, Zhenqiang Chen wrote: > Summary: > * Linaro binary toolchain 2012.04 release. > * Code size benchmark analysis. > > Details: > 1. Validate and bug fix for linaro binary toolchain 2012.04 release. > 2. Investigate code size regressions in 4.7 >  Find more regression cases du