Re: Possible bug with int64_t in GCC 4.9.4

2017-03-27 Thread Jim Wilson
On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 8:30 AM, Fernando Endo wrote: > I've been using GCC 4.9.4 for a while now (arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc (Linaro GCC > 4.9-2017.01) 4.9.4), and I found this strange behavior: > ... > So, this means that warm_and_run_ is assumed by GCC 4.9.4 to have 32 bits > arguments, while they a

Possible bug with int64_t in GCC 4.9.4

2017-03-27 Thread Fernando Endo
Hello all, I've been using GCC 4.9.4 for a while now (arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc (Linaro GCC 4.9-2017.01) 4.9.4), and I found this strange behavior: In the library header (libm5op.h): - #ifdef __cplusplus extern "C" { #endif #include void warm_and_run_(int64_t intervals_warm, int64_t intervals_