On 16 August 2012 13:04, Mans Rullgard wrote:
> On 15 August 2012 22:38, Mans Rullgard wrote:
>> On 15 August 2012 17:17, Matthew Gretton-Dann
>> wrote:
>>> The performance of PGO on 'a popular embedded benchmark' is 14%
>>> improvement, LTO is 7%. Don't know both together, or SPEC.
>>
>> On 'a
On 15 August 2012 22:38, Mans Rullgard wrote:
> On 15 August 2012 17:17, Matthew Gretton-Dann
> wrote:
>> The performance of PGO on 'a popular embedded benchmark' is 14%
>> improvement, LTO is 7%. Don't know both together, or SPEC.
>
> On 'a popular media coding library' PGO gains 2-5% in genera
On 15 August 2012 17:17, Matthew Gretton-Dann
wrote:
> The performance of PGO on 'a popular embedded benchmark' is 14%
> improvement, LTO is 7%. Don't know both together, or SPEC.
On 'a popular media coding library' PGO gains 2-5% in general, in one case
as much as 11%. The relative gains are l
On 15 August 2012 05:36, Michael Hope wrote:
> Hi Matt. I've fleshed out the Etherpad for the PGO and LTO session at:
> http://pad.linaro.org/GzRj35tXFt
I've expanded it a bit further.
> It's a topic list that needs some specifics. Could you make sure we
> have basic answers to any correctnes
Hi Matt. I've fleshed out the Etherpad for the PGO and LTO session at:
http://pad.linaro.org/GzRj35tXFt
It's a topic list that needs some specifics. Could you make sure we
have basic answers to any correctness or performance questions?
Ramana, could you add the specifics from the performance c
