Re: Compiler selection for log10/Qsort on ARM64

2017-02-09 Thread Bharat Bhushan
Thanks Jim, When I uses "-mtune and/or -mcpu" with GCC6.2 then I see almost same number as with GC4.9 Thanks -Bharat On 7 February 2017 at 23:37, Jim Wilson wrote: > On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 7:50 AM, Bharat Bhushan > wrote: > > I am working on log10/qsort benchmarks on ARM64 (ARMv8) processor,

Re: Compiler selection for log10/Qsort on ARM64

2017-02-07 Thread Jim Wilson
On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 7:50 AM, Bharat Bhushan wrote: > I am working on log10/qsort benchmarks on ARM64 (ARMv8) processor, > I want to check if we have experience with these benchmarks. We have experience with things like SPEC and Coremark, which are compiler performance benchmarks. log10/qsort

Re: Compiler selection for log10/Qsort on ARM64

2017-02-07 Thread Adhemerval Zanella
On 07/02/2017 13:50, Bharat Bhushan wrote: > Hi All, > > I am working on log10/qsort benchmarks on ARM64 (ARMv8) processor, > > I want to check if we have experience with these benchmarks. > Actually i am looking for a compiler version which gives best results with > these benchmarks and speci

Compiler selection for log10/Qsort on ARM64

2017-02-07 Thread Bharat Bhushan
Hi All, I am working on log10/qsort benchmarks on ARM64 (ARMv8) processor, I want to check if we have experience with these benchmarks. Actually i am looking for a compiler version which gives best results with these benchmarks and specific compiler optimization (in my case is see O3 gives best n