Re: CS MinGW patches

2010-10-06 Thread Ulrich Weigand
Michael Hope wrote on 10/05/2010 09:44:54 PM: > On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 5:39 AM, Ulrich Weigand wrote: > > Andrew Stubbs wrote: > >> The one exception is this one: > >>    http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-04/msg01214.html > >> (and even that is primarily a GDB issue). > > > > This was merge

Re: CS MinGW patches

2010-10-05 Thread Michael Hope
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 5:39 AM, Ulrich Weigand wrote: > Andrew Stubbs wrote: > >> As discussed in the meeting yesterday, CodeSourcery has a few MinGW >> patches that I had not merged into Linaro GCC. >> >> I have now investigated these patches, and I'm fairly happy that most >> are not necessary

Re: CS MinGW patches

2010-10-05 Thread Ulrich Weigand
Andrew Stubbs wrote: > As discussed in the meeting yesterday, CodeSourcery has a few MinGW > patches that I had not merged into Linaro GCC. > > I have now investigated these patches, and I'm fairly happy that most > are not necessary for Linaro. They're mainly about interworking with Cygwin. > >

CS MinGW patches

2010-10-05 Thread Andrew Stubbs
As discussed in the meeting yesterday, CodeSourcery has a few MinGW patches that I had not merged into Linaro GCC. I have now investigated these patches, and I'm fairly happy that most are not necessary for Linaro. They're mainly about interworking with Cygwin. The one exception is this one: