Taking the occasion to forward this link which Peter mentioned on IRC
with kudos for the Linaro QEMu work and Peter's work:
https://review.source.android.com/#change,23433
[...]
"The system could boot and seems to work perfectly. Not a single issue
has been experienced during testing."
[.
On 7 June 2011 15:10, Christian Robottom Reis wrote:
> If you and Bahadir are interested in cooperating and helping merge work
> from the Google Android branch into upstream to reduce future porting
> effort and improve core functionality, I'm +1 on some priority
> reshuffling to take it on (thoug
On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 06:39:23PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> > PS: I would strongly recommend using the Meego qemu branch rather than
> > upstream, since it seems to have better ARMv7 support.
>
> This was true six or three months ago; it is no longer so and I would
> recommend using upstream
2011/6/1 David Turner :
> I agree, but please note that the last time I tried integrating the upstream
> ARM translator (about one year ago), it failed to properly emulate the
> platform.
> Reasons were bugs in the ARM emulation (e.g. the "IT" Thumb-2 instruction
> was not handled properly when the
Hello,
2011/5/27 Bahadır Balban
> Hello,
>
> The Android emulator supplied by Google:
> http://developer.android.com/guide/developing/tools/emulator.html
> http://developer.android.com/guide/developing/devices/emulator.html
>
> is based on a very old version of QEMU (0.8.2?).
Technically, the
Hello,
The Android emulator supplied by Google:
http://developer.android.com/guide/developing/tools/emulator.html
http://developer.android.com/guide/developing/devices/emulator.html
is based on a very old version of QEMU (0.8.2?). AFAIK it only supports
an ARMv5 platform. It would be very useful
