-toolchain
> Subject: Re: Add dwarf/unwind info in epilogue
>
> On 16 October 2012 14:58, Ramana Radhakrishnan
> wrote:
> > shrink-wrap.patch doesn't apply cleanly to the revision you suggest.
> If you give a clean patch and some description of what happens I might
>
ng.
Thanks!
-Zhenqiang
>
> From: Zhenqiang Chen [zhenqiang.c...@linaro.org]
> Sent: 16 October 2012 04:44
> To: Ramana Radhakrishnan
> Cc: linaro-toolchain
> Subject: Re: Add dwarf/unwind info in epilogue
>
> On 16 October 2012 10:22, Ramana Radhak
amana
From: Zhenqiang Chen [zhenqiang.c...@linaro.org]
Sent: 16 October 2012 04:44
To: Ramana Radhakrishnan
Cc: linaro-toolchain
Subject: Re: Add dwarf/unwind info in epilogue
On 16 October 2012 10:22, Ramana Radhakrishnan
wrote:
> Zhenqiang,
>
> I've been spending
On 16 October 2012 11:44, Zhenqiang Chen wrote:
> On 16 October 2012 10:22, Ramana Radhakrishnan
> wrote:
>> Zhenqiang,
>>
>> I've been spending sometime scratching my head around this one tonight. Can
>> you show me the original shrink-wrap patch as well the test case that
>> triggers this fai
Zhenqiang,
I've been spending sometime scratching my head around this one tonight. Can you
show me the original shrink-wrap patch as well the test case that triggers this
failure ? I have my suspicion on something but need to run a few experiments
before commenting further.
regards,
Ramana
Hi Ramana,
The attached file is a reference patch to add more dwarf/unwind info
in epilogue. Please help to review.
Without the patch, dwarf check fail for the following cases when
enabling shrink-wrap:
tst ... L1 //simple_return
push ...
...
pop ... //.cfa_offset is not 0
L1:
