On 03/05/2012 06:32 PM, Michael Hope wrote:
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 3:06 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
On (06/03/12 14:50), Michael Hope wrote:
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 2:34 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
Hi
FWIW the backport from trunk in r106872 breaks the gcc build
Something like attached is missing from backpo
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 3:06 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
> On (06/03/12 14:50), Michael Hope wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 2:34 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
>> > Hi
>> >
>> > FWIW the backport from trunk in r106872 breaks the gcc build
>> > Something like attached is missing from backport
>>
>> Hi Khem. The fo
On (06/03/12 14:50), Michael Hope wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 2:34 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > FWIW the backport from trunk in r106872 breaks the gcc build
> > Something like attached is missing from backport
>
> Hi Khem. The formatter and vcvt pattern were added in r106847. The
> pa
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 2:34 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
> Hi
>
> FWIW the backport from trunk in r106872 breaks the gcc build
> Something like attached is missing from backport
Hi Khem. The formatter and vcvt pattern were added in r106847. The
pattern was reverted in r106850 but the formatter left in.
Hi
FWIW the backport from trunk in r106872 breaks the gcc build
Something like attached is missing from backport
--
-Khem
Index: gcc-4_6-branch/gcc/config/arm/arm.c
===
--- gcc-4_6-branch.orig/gcc/config/arm/arm.c 2012-03-05 17:14
