Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gdb patch #97698: FAIL: 1 regressions: 1 improvements on arm

2024-09-23 Thread Christophe Lyon
On Mon, 23 Sept 2024 at 15:44, Guinevere Larsen wrote: > > On 9/23/24 10:33 AM, Christophe Lyon wrote: > > Hi Guinevere, > > > > On Mon, 23 Sept 2024 at 14:05, Guinevere Larsen > > wrote: > >> I think some issue has happened in the CI. Both this and 2 patches I've > >> sent to the mailing list (

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gdb patch #97698: FAIL: 1 regressions: 1 improvements on arm

2024-09-23 Thread Guinevere Larsen
On 9/23/24 10:33 AM, Christophe Lyon wrote: Hi Guinevere, On Mon, 23 Sept 2024 at 14:05, Guinevere Larsen wrote: I think some issue has happened in the CI. Both this and 2 patches I've sent to the mailing list (one that changes no code, only the SECURITY.txt file) say that I've introduced regr

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gdb patch #97698: FAIL: 1 regressions: 1 improvements on arm

2024-09-23 Thread Christophe Lyon
Hi Guinevere, On Mon, 23 Sept 2024 at 14:05, Guinevere Larsen wrote: > > I think some issue has happened in the CI. Both this and 2 patches I've > sent to the mailing list (one that changes no code, only the > SECURITY.txt file) say that I've introduced regressions, yet the > relevant test only h

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gdb patch #97698: FAIL: 1 regressions: 1 improvements on arm

2024-09-23 Thread Guinevere Larsen
I think some issue has happened in the CI. Both this and 2 patches I've sent to the mailing list (one that changes no code, only the SECURITY.txt file) say that I've introduced regressions, yet the relevant test only has "no file ID for ". Can you double check what's going on? -- Cheers, Guin