[ACTIVITY] Week 30

* 2 days week o LLVM: * catching-up after vacations. o Misc * Various meetings and discussions. ___ linaro-toolchain mailing list linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain

[ACTIVITY] Week 30

o Back from vacation Thu 24th o LLVM Machine Outliner on ARM * Caught up with upstream developments * Rebased prototype on upstream * Committed patch to assert when liveness tracking is not accurate o Misc * Various meetings and discussions. ___

Re: [ACTIVITY] Week 30

On 07/28/2014 09:35 AM, Renato Golin wrote: > On 28 July 2014 14:27, Christopher Covington wrote: >>> - Work around the lack of perf on v8? >> >> Out of curiosity, what exactly is missing? > > Hi Christopher, > > As far as I know, everything. But maybe this is just for the hardware > we have in

Re: [ACTIVITY] Week 30

On 28 July 2014 14:45, Kugan wrote: > It could be the kernel version we use in lab. AFAIK, Charles had some > luck profiling with perf on newer kernel. I am not sure about the > version though. I have seen working performance counters on 3.15-rc8. The versions of the kernel we have on our aarch64

Re: [ACTIVITY] Week 30

On 28/07/14 23:35, Renato Golin wrote: > On 28 July 2014 14:27, Christopher Covington wrote: >>> - Work around the lack of perf on v8? >> >> Out of curiosity, what exactly is missing? > > Hi Christopher, > > As far as I know, everything. But maybe this is just for the hardware > we have in th

Re: [ACTIVITY] Week 30

On 28 July 2014 14:27, Christopher Covington wrote: >> - Work around the lack of perf on v8? > > Out of curiosity, what exactly is missing? Hi Christopher, As far as I know, everything. But maybe this is just for the hardware we have in the lab... Do you guys have perf working on any piece of

Re: [ACTIVITY] Week 30

Hi Renato, On 07/26/2014 05:18 AM, Renato Golin wrote: > - Work around the lack of perf on v8? Out of curiosity, what exactly is missing? Christopher -- Employee of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by the Linux Foundat

[ACTIVITY] Week 30

== Progress == * GNU Cauldron (4/10) - GCC+LLVM presentation had some positive reviews - Discussed sanitizers roadmap - Very interesting meeting with QuIC * TCWG Sprint (4/10) - Mostly about GNU tools - Team Mission streamlined, looking good - LLVM roadmap attracted some attention - We cou

[ACTIVITY] Week 30

== Issues == * None == Progress == * Prepare Linaro toolchain binary 2013.07 release. * Follow-up patches for pr57637. * Test conditional compare changes based on trunk. == Plan == * Release Linaro toolchain binary 2013.07. * Send out the conditional compare changes for Linaro internal revie

[ACTIVITY] Week 30

== Progress == * Induction and set up work environment * Started investigating how to build gcc cross compilers, so that it can be documented clearly [TCWG-190 ] * I can build a working arm-none-linux-gnueabi crosscompiler, and understand each of the steps i

[ACTIVITY] Week 30

== Progress == * Backported aarch64 string functions and ARM gcc 4.8 fix in eglibc. * Released eglibc 2.17 2013.07-2. * Forward ported binutils AArch64 IFUNC patches to HEAD so Marcus can test them. * Closed stack guard JIRA card and made a new one for pointer guard. * More malloc benchmarking, re

[ACTIVITY] Week 30

== Progress == * Looking at 64-bit divmod on two fronts: - Clean, but intrusive on target-independent code - Dirty and duplicated, but restricted to target-specific code * Long discussion about the purpose of the IR on the LLVMLinux list * Watching some GNU Caldron videos == Plan == * Contin

[Activity ] Week 30

== Progress == * Fixed PR54051 * Improved neon intrinsics testsuite. While still not an execution based testsuite atleast we get compile time tests that are sensible C. Exposed issues - wrote patches. that improve vabal , vaba intrinsics. Fix an issue with costs, fixed an issue with splitters