On 24 November 2011 15:32, Ira Rosen wrote:
> * Disabling peeling for low loop bounds also helps with one of EEMBC
> benchmarks, for which vectorization with double-words is more
> beneficial than with quad-words. It turns out that we are able to
> force the alignment for double-words (and, theref
Hi,
* Worked on peeling problem in eon (#831094). Wrote a patch that
checks if the number of vector iterations is going to be more than 2,
and disables peeling otherwise. With this patch I see about 1.5%
regression with vectorization (and about 7% without it).
* I am thinking to extend the patch
