STRD/LDRD in the prologue and epilogue when compiling for cores with
> an out-of-order microarchitecture, you can workaround the problem by
> compiling with -mcpu=cortex-a7, in which case it will use PUSH and POP
> instead
>
>
>
> On 9 June 2016 at 22:22, William Mills wrote:
>>
Hello,
We have been using Linaro GCC 5.x[1] and valgrind.
When the optimizer is turned on valgrind complains about writes beyond
the current stack pointer. With the optimizer off, the problem report
goes away.
I have my own conclusion about what is going on but I won't bias you
with it. Here a
On 01/27/2016 08:35 AM, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
> On 26/01/16 17:25, Christophe Lyon wrote:
>> On 26 January 2016 at 18:23, Dan Murphy wrote:
>>> Christophe
>>>
>>>
>>> On 01/26/2016 10:58 AM, Christophe Lyon wrote:
On 25 January 2016 at 17:21, Dan Murphy wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
On 02/19/2014 06:41 PM, Ryan Arnold wrote:
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 5:32 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
I wanted to know if there is a 2.19 head for linaro eglibc being created ?
in that case that bbappend needs fixing too.
Thanks
-Khem
Hi Khem,
Since glibc 2.19 just posted we have not yet spun an eglib
On 05/30/2013 07:42 PM, Mans Rullgard wrote:
On 31 May 2013 00:34, William Mills wrote:
We are using the Linaro prebuilt binary 2013.03 toolchain.
We have a program that does a memcpy of 6 bytes and the source and
destination pointers are both 6 byte arrays (through multiple levels of
struct
We are using the Linaro prebuilt binary 2013.03 toolchain.
We have a program that does a memcpy of 6 bytes and the source and
destination pointers are both 6 byte arrays (through multiple levels of
struct & union etc).
At -O2 we get the memcpy inlined.
The code area in question is:
22840: f8b
On 07/16/2012 05:49 PM, Michael Hope wrote:
On 17 July 2012 05:51, William Mills wrote:
On 07/15/2012 09:51 PM, Michael Hope wrote:
We've just started running a weekly benchmark of GCC trunk and Linaro
GCC tip. I've written a short script that compares against a baseline
and s
On 07/15/2012 09:51 PM, Michael Hope wrote:
We've just started running a weekly benchmark of GCC trunk and Linaro
GCC tip. I've written a short script that compares against a baseline
and spits out a graph:
http://ex.seabright.co.nz/benchmarks/gcc-4.8~svn.png
http://ex.seabright.co.nz/benchm
On 03/11/2012 03:52 PM, Michael Hope wrote:
On 10 March 2012 10:49, William Mills wrote:
Do you guys still use 10.04 32 bit as the reference OS or have you moved on?
Yip, it's all as documented. We use a EC2 cloud instance to build.
The problem is we need to patch the LSB headers and
On 03/08/2012 04:07 PM, William Mills wrote:
On 03/08/2012 03:51 PM, Michael Hope wrote:
On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 5:51 AM, William Mills wrote:
All,
I need to supply a Linaro toolchain "aligned" (same source code)
bare-metal
compiler to a group doing benchmarking on A15.
Hi
On 03/08/2012 03:51 PM, Michael Hope wrote:
On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 5:51 AM, William Mills wrote:
All,
I need to supply a Linaro toolchain "aligned" (same source code) bare-metal
compiler to a group doing benchmarking on A15.
Hi William. I recommend using the exact same tools
On 03/08/2012 12:16 PM, Wookey wrote:
+++ Singh, Ravi Kumar (Ravi) [2012-03-08 22:28 +0530]:
Can someone point me to bare metal example using GNU toolchain.
Hector Oron has played with this:
here is a makefile for building some simple code either with
bare-metal compilerof linux/libc compiler
All,
I need to supply a Linaro toolchain "aligned" (same source code)
bare-metal compiler to a group doing benchmarking on A15.
First off my assumption is that we will write our own boot and semi
hosting code. (semi-hosting for TI emulators/simulators is different
than ARM RDI semi-hosting.
13 matches
Mail list logo
