Hi Ramana,
>> I used --target=arm-none-linux-gnueabihf --host=arm-none-linux-gnueabihf
>> --build=arm-none-linux-gnueabihf --with-float=hard. However it seems that the
>> default armhf settings are incorrect. I shouldn't need the --with-float=hard
>> since
>> that is obviously implied by armhf, a
Hi Maxim,
> We use Nvidia TK1s (Cortex-A15) for benchmarking on 32-bit ARM.
That's a bit old, I used Cortex-A57 as the closest to that.
> LTO tends to increase functions due to additional inlining, which increases
> scheduling regions,
> which increases opportunities for the 1st scheduler for i
Hi Maxim,
That sounds rather strange, huge differences due to scheduling are very rare.
Which micro architecture was this run on? I can try running it on trunk and see
what difference it makes with those options.
Cheers,
Wilco
IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are
