Re: clang + VFP

2013-04-25 Thread Sumit Semwal
ilar flags, if > they accept slightly different syntax). > > Hope that helps! > > --renato > > > On 25 April 2013 15:36, Sumit Semwal wrote: >> >> Hi Renato! >> >> Apologies again for troubling you; attached is a log file from one of >> the builds I

Re: clang + VFP

2013-04-25 Thread Sumit Semwal
Thanks a bunch! Best regards, ~Sumit. On 25 April 2013 16:37, Sumit Semwal wrote: > On 25 April 2013 16:19, Renato Golin wrote: >> On 23 April 2013 10:03, Sumit Semwal wrote: >>> >>> Would you please have a look at it, and let me know if you spot something >>&g

Re: clang + VFP

2013-04-25 Thread Sumit Semwal
On 25 April 2013 16:19, Renato Golin wrote: > On 23 April 2013 10:03, Sumit Semwal wrote: >> >> Would you please have a look at it, and let me know if you spot something >> absolutely basic and idiotic? (sorry, and a n00b to llvm / clang world !) > > > I ca

Re: clang + VFP

2013-04-23 Thread Sumit Semwal
t; Two other options that I encourage you to try: > > -integrated-as : the experimental (on ARM) integrated assembler. You won't > be using GAS, so if your code depends on GAS' idiosyncrasies, don't use > this option. > > -O3 : Apart from the usual, this will