Hi Yvan,
>> Kyrill submitted a patch for that issue which was lost in the pile and
>> approved today:
>>
>> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-12/msg00576.html
>>
>> I'll backport it in our branch as soon as it is committed on trunk.
>
> ... I will apply that patch to our tree since the descr
Hi Yvan,
On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 6:57 PM, Yvan Roux wrote:
> On 4 December 2015 at 16:47, Yvan Roux wrote:
>> Hmmm, this seems to be triggered by -mgeneral-regs-only flag, at least
>> on my side, I've to investigate more to give you a real answer, this
>> backport is not a small one ;) But do yo
Hi,
when working with the Linaro patches I found that a particular commit
breaks our aarch64 kernel build.
The patch in question is that one:
commit be09330da9d0777c4a58568d137e3f8a3dbe0a0b
Author: Yvan Roux
Date: Tue Oct 27 21:18:19 2015 +0100
One of the things it attempts to change apparen
Keeping linaro-toolchain in the loop.
Robert
-- Forwarded message --
From: Robert Schiele
Date: Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 4:44 PM
Subject: Re: Lost upstream patch in merge from gcc-5-branch to
linaro/gcc-5-branch
To: Yvan Roux
Hi Yvan,
On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 1:25 PM, Yvan Roux
Hi,
I found that with the merge
commit ac19ac6481a3f326d9f41403f5dadab548b2c8a6
Author: Yvan Roux
Date: Wed Sep 16 10:57:42 2015 +0200
Merge branches/gcc-5-branch rev 227732.
Change-Id: I2f59904b28323b1c72a8cf1bd62c9e460d95bcea
the following branch that was within merge range on gcc
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 2:04 PM, Ulrich Weigand
wrote:
> This does look exactly like:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54684
>
> which was indeed a bug in optimize_unreachable, fixed by Richard Biener:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-09/msg01634.html
>
> Can you verify whethe
Hi Ulrich,
Before I build the cross compiler for ARM target I do a bootstrap
process of an i686 compiler on the same code base to use that one
building the cross compiler to reduce the chance of seeing subtle
problems late in the game. This process unveiled a x86 bootstrap
regression with some of
