Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] llvmorg-21-init-8019-g0ae9bb96d5af: 86 regressions 14 fixes on aarch64

2025-04-15 Thread Peter Klausler
like to check the others.) From: ci_not...@linaro.org Date: Monday, April 14, 2025 at 20:36 To: ohno.yasuy...@fujitsu.com , itou.tets...@fujitsu.com , t-kawash...@fujitsu.com Cc: maxim.kuvyr...@linaro.org , Peter Klausler Subject: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] llvmorg-21-init-8019-g0ae9bb96d5af: 86

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] llvmorg-20-init-15723-gb2c363e2616d: 7 regressions on aarch64

2024-12-19 Thread Peter Klausler
Fixed by https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/120614. From: ci_not...@linaro.org Date: Wednesday, December 18, 2024 at 21:27 To: ohno.yasuy...@fujitsu.com , itou.tets...@fujitsu.com , t-kawash...@fujitsu.com Cc: maxim.kuvyr...@linaro.org , Peter Klausler Subject: [Linaro-TCWG-CI

LLVM-1446

2024-11-26 Thread Peter Klausler
The results now produced by flang(-new) for Fujitsu Fortran test 0676_0160 are better than the desired results of the test. The test uses the SUM intrinsic function to compute the sum of 100 complex numbers. These values are all identical. The new results from the SUM intrinsic function match

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] llvmorg-20-init-7781-g0f973ac783aa: FAIL: 1 regressions on aarch64

2024-10-03 Thread Peter Klausler
The error message for that test is correct. From: ci_not...@linaro.org Date: Thursday, October 3, 2024 at 06:51 To: ohno.yasuy...@fujitsu.com , itou.tets...@fujitsu.com , t-kawash...@fujitsu.com Cc: maxim.kuvyr...@linaro.org , Peter Klausler Subject: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] llvmorg-20-init-7781