On 10 November 2015 at 13:41, Zoltan Kiss wrote:
>
>
> On 10/11/15 07:39, Maxim Uvarov wrote:
>
>> JIT like lua might also not work because you need to rewrite OVS to
>> support it. I don't think that it will be accepted.
>>
>> And it looks like it'
JIT like lua might also not work because you need to rewrite OVS to support
it. I don't think that it will be accepted.
And it looks like it's problem in OVS, not in ODP. I.e. OVS should allow
to use library functions for fast path (where inlines are critical). I.e.
not just call odp_packet_len(
On 27 November 2014 at 12:16, Ola Liljedahl
wrote:
> Thanks Maxim,
>
> Yes I should do that. I also intend to make the code used to reproduce
> the problem smaller.
>
> One of my worries was that GCC considered the loop without side
> effects (ignoring the inline assembler in odp_spin()) and thus
