Hi Christophe,
On Fri, 2024-09-20 at 15:30 +0200, Christophe Lyon wrote:
> Looks like our build queue is full (well more than full ~60 builds of
> this type pending), bisecting regressions introduced before I pushed
> my fix in the linker.
>
> I think that it should be OK within a few more days.
Hi,
I thought this was resolved, but...
On Thu, 2024-09-12 at 21:47 +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 12, 2024 at 09:25:08AM +0200, Christophe Lyon wrote:
> > Right, sorry for the breakage.
> > This should now be fixed by
> > https://sourceware.org/pipermail/bi
On Thu, Sep 12, 2024 at 09:25:08AM +0200, Christophe Lyon wrote:
> Right, sorry for the breakage.
> This should now be fixed by
> https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/2024-September/136743.html
Thanks, the latest testresults look a lot more reasonable.
Cheers,
Mark
_
Hi,
ci_not...@linaro.org is sending test results to
gcc-restresu...@gcc.gnu.org but recently starting to fail so many tests
that they don't get accepted anymore:
From: ci_not...@linaro.org on Tue Sep 10 02:17:32 2024
Subject: Results for 15.0.0 20240906 (experimental) [master revision
gcc-15-3512
