Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] fujitsu_testsuite#a0e269d5d: 2 regressions on aarch64

Should have been reported as follows. Dear contributor, Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. In tcwg_flang_test/main-aarch64-O0-debug, after: | commit fujitsu_testsuite#a0e269d5d | Author: KAWASHIMA Takahiro | Date: Tue Nov 1

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] fujitsu_testsuite#471c71be0: 19 regressions141 improvements on aarch64

Should have been reported as follows. Some regressions and some improvements after this commit in fujitsu testsuite. Regards, Dear contributor, Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. In tcwg_flang_test/main-aarch64-O3-neoverse_v1-sve_vla

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] llvmorg-20-init-13009-g3f594741cf8e: 1 regressions1 improvements on aarch64

Should have been reported as below. Dear contributor, Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. In tcwg_flang_test/main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vla, after: | commit llvmorg-20-init-13009-g3f594741cf8e | Author: Peter Klausler | Date: Th

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] llvmorg-19.1.1-16-g9f743a87e: 30 regressions on aarch64

It should have been reported as below. This is after this commit in llvm-test-suite. Dear contributor, Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. In tcwg_flang_test/main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vla, after: | commit llvmorg-19.1.1-16-g9f743a87e

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] llvmorg-20-init-12914-g5d38e6e42a90: 32 regressions on aarch64

This report should have been as below. We are checking what went wrong on our side. Dear contributor, Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. In tcwg_flang_test/main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vla, after: | commit llvmorg-20-init-12914-g5d38e6e

Re: Lots of failing tests on arm-unknown-eabi

Yes, I reported to Christophe yesterday, he confirmed this comes from his linker commit and he's looking at it. Laurent On Thu, 12 Sept 2024 at 04:38, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote: > Hi Mark, > > I believe this was caused by Christophe's binutils patch, which has now > been fixed. > > Christophe, please

Re: [TCWG CI] [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after gdb-13-branchpoint-527-g46758593515: Rename to allow_ifunc_tests

Thiago, This is a false alarm.. Sorry about that. This has nothing to do with gdb, it complains about a spec2006 benchmark. not even a gcc testsuite issue. It is just a benchmark instability build issue. tonto benchmark was unstable due to an issue when parallelizing make, with remote compil