Hi Mark,
2011/3/22 Mark Hymers :
> The current design is the Binary packages can contain an additional
> control field: Built-Using.
First of all, thanks very much for taking care of it, that probably
will get us going.
I just would like to point out that current design solves half of
the pr
Hi,
2009/11/2 Mark Hymers :
> On Mon, 02, Nov, 2009 at 12:43:42PM +, Philipp Kern spoke thus..
>> Of course it is a sane approach but very special care needs to be taken when
>> releasing to ensure GPL compliance. So what we should get is support in the
>> toolchain to declare against what so
Hello,
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 12:16:31AM +0200, Loïc Minier wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 27, 2010, Hector Oron wrote:
> > I would even go further and I would try to have all (build-)essential
> > packages provide a consistent -source package, for easier work on
> > bootstrappi
Hello Marcin,
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 01:06:15PM +0200, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
> To make it possible I also have to alter contents of *-source binary packages
> from binutils/eglibc/gcc/linux to have a possibility to reuse their packaging
> rules in new $ARCH-cross-compiler package on which I
Hello,
2010/7/27 Marcin Juszkiewicz :
> Dnia wtorek, 27 lipca 2010 o 14:03:57 Loïc Minier napisał(a):
>> On Tue, Jul 27, 2010, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
>> > And here I have a problem. How much of debian/ directory should be
>> > provided in *-source binary packages? Minimal set just to be able to
