bolic from anything but x86/x86-64 to
work around it for the time being, as we started getting reports of the
same issue for PPC as well.
Thanks,
--
Join us Oct 6-8 at BCC Berlin for Qt Developer Days 2014!
Giuseppe D'Angelo | giuseppe.dang...@kdab.com | Software Engineer
KDAB (UK) Ltd
erything "just works" even on ARM; that's why we encountered
the issue only these days...).
Thanks,
--
Giuseppe D'Angelo | giuseppe.dang...@kdab.com | Software Engineer
KDAB (UK) Ltd., a KDAB Group company
Tel. UK +44-1738-450410, Sweden (HQ) +46-563-540090
KDAB - Qt Experts -
idering turning
-Bsymbolic off on all architectures but x86/x86-64 (to avoid this issue)
[1], but we could keep ARM and disable -Bsymbolic only on "older"
binutils (if your patch gets merged).
[1] https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTBUG-36129
Thanks,
--
Giuseppe D'Angelo | giusep
n the meanwhile, I've found that if I add "-pie" (together with -fPIE)
when building the final executable, the testcase works. Again, I don't
quite know what's changing. But that might be a workaround (instead of
dropping -Bsymbolic or start using --dynamic-list).
shared -Wall -o libshared.so -Wl,-Bsymbolic shared.cpp
> g++ -fPIE -Wall -o main main.cpp -L. -lshared
(The long story is that Qt 5 is taking PMFs in its public API, and the
comparison failing inside of Qt shared libraries is breaking code on
ARM, as -Bsymbolic is set by default there.)
Thanks,
--
