Re: Armhf dynamic linker path

2012-05-02 Thread Dennis Gilmore
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 02 May 2012 00:39:37 -0400 Jon Masters wrote: > On 05/02/2012 12:15 AM, Michael Hope wrote: > > On 27 April 2012 11:59, Michael Hope > > wrote: > >> On 23 April 2012 14:23, Jon Masters wrote: > >>> On 04/22/2012 06:06 PM, Michael Hope wrote

Re: Phone call (was Re: Armhf dynamic linker path)

2012-04-12 Thread Dennis Gilmore
On Wed, 11 Apr 2012 20:44:22 -0300 Paulo César Pereira de Andrade wrote: > Em 11 de abril de 2012 20:22, Michael Hope > escreveu: > > On 12 April 2012 10:38, Steve McIntyre > > wrote: > >> On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 02:06:09AM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: > >>> > >>>And here's the details as promi

Re: Armhf dynamic linker path

2012-03-31 Thread Dennis Gilmore
On Sat, 31 Mar 2012 12:04:20 -0400 Jon Masters wrote: > On 03/31/2012 10:42 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > > > I can say for Fedora that we have no plans to adopt that change. > > AFAIK we never agreed to do so infact this is the first ive heard > > of it, we have moved e

Re: Armhf dynamic linker path

2012-03-31 Thread Dennis Gilmore
On Sat, 31 Mar 2012 11:34:13 +0100 Steve McIntyre wrote: > Hi folks, > > We really need to push on with getting the loader path for armhf > standardised. The path that was agreed months ago is > > /lib/arm-linux-gnueabihf/ld-linux.so.3 > > but clearly not everybody is using that yet. Dann has