On Thu, Dec 02, 2010 at 10:54:32AM +0200, Ira Rosen wrote:
> On 1 December 2010 17:57, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 01, 2010 at 11:16:16AM +0200, Ira Rosen wrote:
> >> The meaning of the builtin (or maybe a new tree code would be better?)
> >> is that the el
arated, and there's no instruction to efficiently implement the
deinterleaving from registers. For instance, suppose a pseudo gets
propagated into the builtin and we can't find the MEM_REFs any more.
The resulting code could easily be worse than pre-vectorization.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
st case.
I do not think we should drop the patch.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery
___
linaro-toolchain mailing list
linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain
st ping Steven?
It's been a while, but I think discussion elsewhere (a bug log maybe?)
indicated that Steven wasn't happy with it.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery
___
linaro-toolchain mailing list
linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain
