On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 1:16 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 24 November 2011 23:06, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> On 24 November 2011 22:02, Christoffer Dall wrote:
>>> On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 4:27 PM, Peter Maydell
>>> wrote:
>>>> Pretty high up my todo
[snip]
>> A remaining item is to test this setup
>> with the KVM stuff, but it should be a minor thing as long as the
>> kernel headers for KVM/ARM can be integrated with the build process
>> somehow. (Or is there an alternative?).
>
> Ah, kernel headers, good point. QEMU now carries the KVM kerne
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 4:27 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 24 November 2011 20:11, Christoffer Dall wrote:
>>> This isn't strictly a requirement for KVM, but we're going to want
>>> KVM to be able to hand off cp15 accesses to QEMU, and I don't think
&g
>
> This isn't strictly a requirement for KVM, but we're going to want
> KVM to be able to hand off cp15 accesses to QEMU, and I don't think
> that's going to be maintainable or reliable without this refactoring.
Why do we need KVM to hand off cp15 accesses to QEMU? As of now almost
all of this is
