On 6 October 2017 at 13:26, Christophe Lyon wrote:
[...]
>
> Hi all,
>
> My patch was finally accepted last week and committed.
> I also backported it to the gcc-7-branch, so that the problem will
> be fixed in the next gcc-7 release (either FSF or Linaro).
>
Thanks Christophe
___
On 12 November 2015 at 06:43, Shawn Guo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I need some help to understand aarch64-linux-gnu-objdump output in .data
> section as below. It's part of the dump of u-boot image with command
> 'aarch64-linux-gnu-objdump -D -z u-boot'.
>
> Disassembly of section .data:
>
> 350398
On 30 October 2014 11:31, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On 30 October 2014 11:20, Jens Wiklander wrote:
>> Hi toolchain champions,
>>
>> [please keep me in cc as I'm not subscribed to
>> linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org]
>>
>> In OP-TEE we are going to act
On 30 October 2014 11:20, Jens Wiklander wrote:
> Hi toolchain champions,
>
> [please keep me in cc as I'm not subscribed to
> linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org]
>
> In OP-TEE we are going to activate a pager which is an integrated part of
> the statically linked secure OS binary (compiled for ARM
On 28 May 2013 12:03, Matthew Gretton-Dann
wrote:
> So before we go any further I would like to see what the view of LEG is
> about a better malloc. My questions boil down to:
>
> * Is malloc important - or do server applications just implement their own?
The Apache web server manages its heap
