Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc patch #105574: 1 regressions 1 improvements on arm

2025-01-28 Thread Maxim Kuvyrkov
Hi Siddhesh, The reason that the notification was sent is because a pre-existing test failure was renamed from ... >> | FAIL: gcc.dg/pr41123.c (internal compiler error: in gen_movsf, at >> /home/tcwg-buildslave/workspace/tcwg_gnu_2/abe/snapshots/gcc.git~master/gcc/config/arm/arm.md:74 ... to

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc patch #105574: 1 regressions 1 improvements on arm

2025-01-28 Thread Siddhesh Poyarekar
Has the bisect somehow failed in this? It's highly unlikely that a test macro would cause an ICE, unless it somehow exposed a latent bug, which also seems very unlikely in this context. Sid On 2025-01-28 20:48, ci_not...@linaro.org wrote: Dear contributor, Our automatic CI has detected prob