Takahiro Kawashima (Fujitsu) wrote:
> I took a look. This is probably caused by a floating-point arithmetic error.
>
> The Fortran source program is
> https://github.com/fujitsu/compiler-test-suite/blob/main/Fortran/0354/0354_0334.F90
> . The compilation flags are `-O3 -ffast-math`.
>
> Changing
Hi,
I took a look. This is probably caused by a floating-point arithmetic error.
The Fortran source program is
https://github.com/fujitsu/compiler-test-suite/blob/main/Fortran/0354/0354_0334.F90
. The compilation flags are `-O3 -ffast-math`.
Changing `1.0E-6` to `1.0E-3` in the first line reso
Hi,
Can I get a reduced .ll showing the regression, or some reduced steps for
reproducing the bug? I suspect the bug is elsewhere, and not in the commit
itself.
Warm regards,
Ram
On Thu, Sep 5, 2024 at 3:39 AM wrote:
> Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your
>
On Thu 2024-09-05 13:59:00, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote:
> Hi Filip,
>
> FYI, your patch below causes linux kernel build failure on arm64. Could you
> take a look, please?
>
Hi Maxim,
I'm taking a look now. It seems that the __builtin_popcount I insert in the
switch conversion pass doesn't expand t
Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your
patch(es). Please find some details below. If you have any questions, please
follow up on linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org mailing list, Libera's
#linaro-tcwg channel, or ping your favourite Linaro toolchain developer on
On Wed, Sep 04, 2024 at 10:36:41PM +, ci_not...@linaro.org wrote:
> Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your
> patch(es). Please find some details below. If you have any questions,
> please follow up on linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org mailing list, Libera's
