> -Original Message-
> From: Thiago Jung Bauermann
> Sent: Friday, April 26, 2024 3:40 PM
> To: Andrew Pinski (QUIC)
> Cc: linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org
> Subject: Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc patch #89057: FAIL: 28 regressions on arm
>
> WARNING: This email originated from outside of Qu
Hello Andrew,
"Andrew Pinski (QUIC)" writes:
> These are all expected "failures" for arm (aarch32) really; the new testcases
> were known
> to fail for that target; it is recorded as PR 224847. I was not sure how to
> record this
> besides in the commit message.
Is the PR number correct? I ca
These are all expected "failures" for arm (aarch32) really; the new testcases
were known to fail for that target; it is recorded as PR 224847. I was not sure
how to record this besides in the commit message.
Should I xfail them for the targets that are known to fail?
Thanks,
Andrew Pinski
> ---
Progress:
* UM-2 [QEMU upstream maintainership]
- made the 9.0 release and handed over pullreq processing to RTH
for the 9.1 cycle
- collected up and sent out the first target-arm pullreq for 9.1
- finished creating JIRA issues for QEMU for FEAT_* features
to bring us into sync with
