Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] glibc patch #85585: FAIL: 1 regressions on arm

On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 10:02 AM Adhemerval Zanella Netto wrote: > > > > On 15/02/24 09:13, H.J. Lu wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 4:12 AM H.J. Lu wrote: > >> > >> On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 3:49 AM Adhemerval Zanella Netto > >> wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> On 15/02/24 08:47, H.J. Lu wrote: >

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] glibc patch #85772: FAIL: 1 regressions on aarch64

On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 11:36 AM wrote: > > Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your > patch(es). Please find some details below. If you have any questions, > please follow up on linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org mailing list, Libera's > #linaro-tcwg channel, o

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] glibc patch #85585: FAIL: 1 regressions on arm

On 15/02/24 09:13, H.J. Lu wrote: > On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 4:12 AM H.J. Lu wrote: >> >> On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 3:49 AM Adhemerval Zanella Netto >> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> On 15/02/24 08:47, H.J. Lu wrote: On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 12:01 AM Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote: > >> On Feb 15,

[ACTIVITY] report week ending 15 Feb

Progress (short week, 3 days): * UM-2 [QEMU upstream maintainership] - various bits of cleanup and maintainer stuff - working on a 3-phase-reset-aware equivalent to qemu_register_reset(): have some basically working code, need to tidy it up and look for where the changes it makes to re

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] glibc patch #85585: FAIL: 1 regressions on arm

On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 4:12 AM H.J. Lu wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 3:49 AM Adhemerval Zanella Netto > wrote: > > > > > > > > On 15/02/24 08:47, H.J. Lu wrote: > > > On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 12:01 AM Maxim Kuvyrkov > > > wrote: > > >> > > >>> On Feb 15, 2024, at 03:54, H.J. Lu wrote: > >

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] glibc patch #85585: FAIL: 1 regressions on arm

On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 3:49 AM Adhemerval Zanella Netto wrote: > > > > On 15/02/24 08:47, H.J. Lu wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 12:01 AM Maxim Kuvyrkov > > wrote: > >> > >>> On Feb 15, 2024, at 03:54, H.J. Lu wrote: > >>> > >>> FAIL: elf/tst-gnu2-tls2 > >>> > >>> indicates that your _dl_tl

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] glibc patch #85585: FAIL: 1 regressions on arm

On 15/02/24 08:47, H.J. Lu wrote: > On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 12:01 AM Maxim Kuvyrkov > wrote: >> >>> On Feb 15, 2024, at 03:54, H.J. Lu wrote: >>> >>> FAIL: elf/tst-gnu2-tls2 >>> >>> indicates that your _dl_tlsdesc_dynamic may not preserve all caller-saved >>> registers. Please find out how the

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] glibc patch #85585: FAIL: 1 regressions on arm

On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 12:01 AM Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote: > > > On Feb 15, 2024, at 03:54, H.J. Lu wrote: > > > > FAIL: elf/tst-gnu2-tls2 > > > > indicates that your _dl_tlsdesc_dynamic may not preserve all caller-saved > > registers. Please find out how the test fails. > > Hi H.J., > > See below.

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc patch #85713: FAIL: 19 regressions on arm

Hi Richard, This is a false positive. We had a bit of instability in our CI yesterday, and it should be all fixed now. Thanks, -- Maxim Kuvyrkov https://www.linaro.org > On Feb 14, 2024, at 23:00, ci_not...@linaro.org wrote: > > Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems relate

[Linaro-TCWG-CI] binutils-2_41-release-2297-g313f04b6edc: FAIL: 1 regressions on arm

Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. If you have any questions, please follow up on linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org mailing list, Libera's #linaro-tcwg channel, or ping your favourite Linaro toolchain developer on

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] glibc patch #85585: FAIL: 1 regressions on arm

> On Feb 15, 2024, at 03:54, H.J. Lu wrote: > > FAIL: elf/tst-gnu2-tls2 > > indicates that your _dl_tlsdesc_dynamic may not preserve all caller-saved > registers. Please find out how the test fails. Hi H.J., See below. ... > FAIL: 1 regressions > > regressions.sum: >=== glib