Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] glibc-2.38.9000-528-g6bd0e4efcc: FAIL: 1 regressions on arm

2024-01-30 Thread Maxim Kuvyrkov
Hi Arjun, This is not a real regression. We have a problem in our CI that causes container tests fail for 32-bit ARM. Therefore, any new container test shows up as a regression. We are working on fixing this. Thanks, -- Maxim Kuvyrkov https://www.linaro.org > On Jan 31, 2024, at 06:42, ci_

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc patch #85019: FAIL: 29 regressions on aarch64

2024-01-30 Thread H.J. Lu
On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 5:45 PM wrote: > > Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your > patch(es). Please find some details below. If you have any questions, > please follow up on linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org mailing list, Libera's > #linaro-tcwg channel, or

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gdb-14-branchpoint-1426-gb960445a459: FAIL: 1 regressions on arm

2024-01-30 Thread Maxim Kuvyrkov
Hi All, This is a false positive, obviously. We do our best to filter out flaky tests, but in this case "gdb.threads/staticthreads.exp: up 10" PASSed twice in the previous run, and then FAILed twice in the next run. Sneaky! Re. the FAIL, the testcase expects to be " in main .*" after "up 10",

[Linaro-TCWG-CI] glibc-2.38.9000-528-g6bd0e4efcc: FAIL: 1 regressions on arm

2024-01-30 Thread ci_notify
Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. If you have any questions, please follow up on linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org mailing list, Libera's #linaro-tcwg channel, or ping your favourite Linaro toolchain developer on