Hi H.J.,
Did the email below made it to your inbox? I wonder if some of our precommit
CI emails are not reaching developers.
Kind regards,
--
Maxim Kuvyrkov
https://www.linaro.org
> On Jan 10, 2024, at 02:24, ci_not...@linaro.org wrote:
>
> Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected pro
Hi Nathaniel,
> On Jan 18, 2024, at 13:02, Nathaniel Shead via Gcc-regression
> wrote:
>
> Thanks for the notification! I took a look and the error seems to be
> something specific to the TLS implementation for ARM requiring
> additional flags to link correctly, maybe?
Looking at [1], it seems
On 1/16/24 07:42, ci_not...@linaro.org wrote:
FAIL: 1 regressions: 1 progressions
regressions.sum:
=== gdb tests ===
Running gdb:gdb.threads/staticthreads.exp ...
FAIL: gdb.threads/staticthreads.exp: up 10
FTR, filed as https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31254 .
Thanks for the notification! I took a look and the error seems to be
something specific to the TLS implementation for ARM requiring
additional flags to link correctly, maybe?
I'm unable to test locally (I don't have access to an ARM machine) but
from looking at other testsuite examples which make
On 18/01/24 10:23, Joseph Myers wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Jan 2024, ci_not...@linaro.org wrote:
>
>> In master-arm after:
>>
>> | commit glibc-2.38.9000-496-gdf11c05be9
>> | Author: Joseph Myers
>> | Date: Wed Jan 17 15:38:54 2024 +
>> |
>> | Update syscall lists for Linux 6.7
On Thu, 18 Jan 2024, ci_not...@linaro.org wrote:
> In master-arm after:
>
> | commit glibc-2.38.9000-496-gdf11c05be9
> | Author: Joseph Myers
> | Date: Wed Jan 17 15:38:54 2024 +
> |
> | Update syscall lists for Linux 6.7
> |
> | Linux 6.7 adds the futex_requeu
Hi Thiago,
| nm: Replace --with-symbol-versions with --without-symbol-versions in
--help output
FAIL: 13 regressions: 13 progressions
As you're aware, the above are flaky results that the CI wasn't able to
filter out as it normally does. Sorry for the false positive.
Phew! :-) I
