On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 8:18 PM, $rik@nth wrote:
> There is no way to build static tool chain by using abe tool at all?
Maybe modify abe/lib/make.sh to add -static directly to LDFLAGS?
Jim
___
linaro-toolchain mailing list
linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.
On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 6:44 AM, Jim Wilson wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 11:30 AM, $rik@nth wrote:
>> I am issuing abe with `../abe.sh --set cflags="-static" --set
>> ldflags="-pthread" --host arm-linux-gnueabi --target arm-linux-gnueabi
>> --build all`
>> am i configuring something wrong her
== Progress ==
* Type promotion pass (4/10)
- Tested many different architectures
- Branch created
- Getting ready to benchmark
* LTO (2/10)
- Read VRP algorithms - new
- Discussing algorithm implementation
* Bugs (1/10)
- PR70359
* Misc (1/10)
- GCC Lists
- Jenkins benchmarking
On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 11:30 AM, $rik@nth wrote:
> I am issuing abe with `../abe.sh --set cflags="-static" --set
> ldflags="-pthread" --host arm-linux-gnueabi --target arm-linux-gnueabi
> --build all`
> am i configuring something wrong here? Please correct me
That won't work without an arm-linu
On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 9:27 PM, Jim Wilson wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 2, 2016 at 3:00 AM, $rik@nth wrote:
>> /home/hydlnxbld84/Srikanth/abe/build/snapshots/gcc.git~linaro-gcc-5-branch/gcc/real.h:79:76:
>> error: size of array test_real_width is negative
>>[sizeof (REAL_VALUE_TYPE) <= REAL_WIDTH * s
On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 7:10 AM, $rik@nth wrote:
> I've read the Wiki page and start using abe tool to build cross
> compile for ARM on x86 build system. But i am getting below error.
> Also --set arch=arm argument is showing the arch is not found while
> configuring.
Abe --set arch= translates i
On Sat, Apr 2, 2016 at 3:00 AM, $rik@nth wrote:
> /home/hydlnxbld84/Srikanth/abe/build/snapshots/gcc.git~linaro-gcc-5-branch/gcc/real.h:79:76:
> error: size of array test_real_width is negative
>[sizeof (REAL_VALUE_TYPE) <= REAL_WIDTH * sizeof (HOST_WIDE_INT) ? 1 : -1];
I don't know offhand h
Hi Christophe,
On 2016/4/4 3:58, Christophe Lyon wrote:
On 1 April 2016 at 12:04, Ramana Radhakrishnan
wrote:
On 31/03/16 18:26, Jim Wilson wrote:
On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 5:12 AM, fengwei.yin wrote:
Because gcc 4.9 could build this file without any issue, I apply
--save-temps
with gcc 4.9.
== Progress ==
o Extended validation (7/10)
* Fixed and improved extended native validation
* Discussed proposed patch in dejagnu on process killing mechanism
* Testing a fix/workaround in GCC guality tests
* Re-implemented and tested fix for dejagnu remote layout
o Misc (3/10)
* Va
