On 19 January 2016 at 00:06, Adhemerval Zanella
wrote:
> No one has posted any patch or stirred discussions about it. The complex
> function in libm are usually coded in in C to be platform neutral, with
> some specific function being optimized (rounding, etc.). x86_64 also have
> some assembly i
== Progress ==
- LTO and TCWG480 (6/10)
* Read and experimented with GCC's LTO codebase.
* Setup archlinux on chromebook and ran coremark with perf
* Read referenced publications
- PR66726 (2/10)
* Rebased the patch
* Regression tested on x86_64 and using Chritsope's setup
* getting re
Hi Virendra,
On 18-01-2016 15:54, Virendra Kumar Pathak wrote:
> Hi Linaro Toochain Group,
>
> I have few questions on glibc+libm w.r.t aarch64.
> If possible, please provide some insight, otherwise kindly redirect me to the
> concerned person/forum.
>
> 1.It seems from the community patches th
Hi Linaro Toochain Group,
I have few questions on glibc+libm w.r.t aarch64.
If possible, please provide some insight, otherwise kindly redirect me to
the concerned person/forum.
1.It seems from the community patches that ARM/Linaro is optimizing glibc
functions such as memcpy/memmove, string for
o Teaching activity (2/10)
== Progress ==
o Linaro GCC (4/10)
* Completed backports for 2016.01
* Merged FSF 5 branch into Linaro 5 one
* Delivered 2016.01 Snapshot
* Try to reproduce Linaro PR #1988 with 2016.01.
issue not reproducible
o GCC dev. (3/10)
* Fix armv8.1-a handl
Port to microinstance - TCWG-432 [3/10]
* Fallout from attempts to fix race condition
* Various minor fixes - simplifications, better reporting
Backport benchmarking - TCWG-352 [1/10]
* Decoupled 'target triple' from 'toolchain' name
** Immediately, to let me benchmark with Juno-built native gcc
*
== This Week ==
* PR69133 (2/10)
- Submitted patch upstream for review.
* PR24293 (4/10)
- Submitted patch upstream for review, and did changes suggested by Joseph Myers
* TCWG-319 (1/10)
- fp benchmarking complete, sent results upstream for review.
* TCWG-72 (1/10)
- Addressing Jim's comments