On Mon, 4 Jan 2016, Adhemerval Zanella wrote:
> Nicolas, I am about to start a new thread about ""ld -r" on mixed
> IR/non-IR objects", asking current status from H.J. Lu, what is
> preventing upstream merge, concerns and objections.
>
> First I would to know which the priority of this feature f
GCC GO has not moved away from split stack.
I think GCC GO should be supported.
There are a few other items on the parity list before ld -r support is needed.
Including inside the kernel.
-Original Message-
From: Adhemerval Zanella [mailto:adhemerval.zane...@linaro.org]
Sent: Monday,
On 23-12-2015 15:41, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Dec 2015, Adhemerval Zanella wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>> Em 22 de dez de 2015, às 14:22, Nicolas Pitre
>>> escreveu:
>>>
On Mon, 21 Dec 2015, Jim Wilson wrote:
I tracked the bulk of the patch back to April 2011, though some new
These are orthogonal requests, let's track them independently. Also,
although I noticed s390 work to add split-stack support, my understanding
is it is mainly aimed for go runtime support and current go moved
*away* from split-stack [1]. Which are the current usercases aimed for
split-stack suppor
