Parimala,
Can you try linaro toolchain?
Please find gcc-linaro-arm-none-eabi-4.8-2013.11* at
http://releases.linaro.org/13.11/components/toolchain/binaries/
Thanks!
-Zhenqiang
On 20 December 2013 13:36, Parimala Baggiri wrote:
> Hello Terry,
>
> U-boot is in thumb mode and the THUMB mode applic
My understanding is that your u-boot is built in THUMB mode and also run in
THUMB mode now, but your helloworld application is still ARM code. Then under
thumb mode u-boot, you issue command "go 8200 hello" to run an ARM
application. Is my understanding correct?
If correct, my gut feeling i
On 19 December 2013 13:36, Parimala Baggiri wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am using the pre-built toolchain gcc-arm-none-eabi-4_6-2012q2 from linaro
> to compile u-boot (u-boot-linaro-stable) and to compile my standalone
> applications to run on target(PandaBoard ES rev b2)
>
> hello_world standalone appli
Hello,
I am using the pre-built toolchain gcc-arm-none-eabi-4_6-2012q2 from linaro
to compile u-boot (u-boot-linaro-stable) and to compile my standalone
applications to run on target(PandaBoard ES rev b2)
hello_world standalone application which comes with u-boot is executing
fine on target when
On 18/12/13 05:06, Jonathan S. Shapiro wrote:
> At the risk of sticking my nose in, this isn't a startup code issue.
> It's a contract issue.
>
> First, I don't buy Richard's argument about memcpy() startup costs and
> hard-to-predict branches. We do those tests on essentially every
> *other* RISC
