On 20 November 2013 23:59, Zhenqiang Chen wrote:
> No. Linaro toolchain does not have the libraries for Cortex-M.
Thank you. That's exactly the information I was hoping to find :-)
___
linaro-toolchain mailing list
linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org
htt
On 21 November 2013 12:06, Trevor Woerner wrote:
> On 20 November 2013 21:57, Zhenqiang Chen wrote:
>>> Does anyone know if gcc-arm-embedded has things the Linaro toolchain
>>> doesn't wrt Cortex M0, M3, and M4 device/instruction support?
>>
>> Yes. The https://launchpad.net/gcc-arm-embedded supp
On 20 November 2013 21:57, Zhenqiang Chen wrote:
>> Does anyone know if gcc-arm-embedded has things the Linaro toolchain
>> doesn't wrt Cortex M0, M3, and M4 device/instruction support?
>
> Yes. The https://launchpad.net/gcc-arm-embedded supports Cortex M0, M3, and
> M4.
What about https://launc
On 21 November 2013 10:44, Trevor Woerner wrote:
> Hi toolchain gurus,
>
> I am about to start some projects working with CortexMx devices and am
> wondering if anyone has an opinion on which toolchain(s) I should
> use/investigate?
>
> Being a fan of Linaro, my first instinct would be to use cbui
Hi toolchain gurus,
I am about to start some projects working with CortexMx devices and am
wondering if anyone has an opinion on which toolchain(s) I should
use/investigate?
Being a fan of Linaro, my first instinct would be to use cbuild2 to
build an arm-none-eabi- toolchain from a 4.8.x tree. Bu
On 20 November 2013 17:57, Christopher Covington wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We've noticed an issue trying to use the Linaro AArch64 binary bare metal
> toolchain release with the MMU turned off for some low-level tests.
>
> Anytime puts, sprintf, etc. gets called, a reent structure gets created with
> refer
Hi,
We've noticed an issue trying to use the Linaro AArch64 binary bare metal
toolchain release with the MMU turned off for some low-level tests.
Anytime puts, sprintf, etc. gets called, a reent structure gets created with
references to STDIN, STDOUT, STDERR FILE types. A member in the __sFile
st
Original Message
Subject:[Bug target/59216] [ARM] negdi*extendsidi regression
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2013 18:06:14 +0100
From: christophe.lyon at st dot com
To: Christophe LYON
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59216
--- Comment #2 from christophe.ly