== Progress ==
* 3.3 Release
- Bootstrapping, testing, fixing bugs, etc.
- RC1 released on Tuesday
http://people.linaro.org/~rengolin/llvm/
- Fix for C11 atomics on Linux
http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=15429
- Fix for zero extend vector bug in test-suite
http://llvm.org/bugs/sho
== Progress ==
* Finished porting ld-ifunc tests to AArch64.
* Requested a relocation number for R_AARCH64_IRELATIVE.
* Tested AArch64 ifunc code natively to run generic ifunc tests.
* Investigated gdb bug #1175525 and submitted workaround patch to gdb-patches.
* Started DeveloperTools and Library
== Progress ==
* Disable-peeling: analyzed regression on one bench.
* Libsanitizer/aarch64:
- porting will require more effort than aarch32.
- some syscalls are not supported by aarch64
- libsanitizer expects frame to grow downwards (true on aarch32,
false on aarch64)
* PGO/LTO bug reported b
Progress:
* VIRT-49, VIRT-50 [cp15 migration, reset]
** last bits of patch cleanup complete; realised I could test
KVM migration without any timer or vgic patches; did so and
sent first version of patches out to qemu-devel
* VIRT-55:
** started to draft basic notes on what we want to te
On 17 May 2013 14:45, Mans Rullgard wrote:
> I suppose those who have a need for this information already know
> how to interpret those values. Translating the ARM IDs to model
> names would be rather trivial.
>
Great! Do I hear someone volunteering to implement that in the Kernel? ;)
cheers,
On 17 May 2013 14:26, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 17 May 2013 14:03, Mans Rullgard wrote:
>> On 17 May 2013 13:30, Renato Golin wrote:
>>> Why don't we print full information like Intel?
>>
>> The part you snipped:
>>
CPU implementer : 0x41
CPU architecture: 7
CPU variant : 0x
On 17 May 2013 14:03, Mans Rullgard wrote:
> On 17 May 2013 13:30, Renato Golin wrote:
>> Why don't we print full information like Intel?
>
> The part you snipped:
>
>>> CPU implementer : 0x41
>>> CPU architecture: 7
>>> CPU variant : 0x0
>>> CPU part : 0xc05
>>> CPU revision : 1
>
> Th
On 17 May 2013 13:30, Renato Golin wrote:
> On 17 May 2013 08:18, YongQin Liu wrote:
>> > * What platform are you testing on?
>> The device I am testing on is an SP8810 device. here is the content of the
>> cpuinfo
>
> I believe that's a Cortex-A5.
>
>> root@android:/ # cat /proc/cpuinfo
>> Proce
On 17 May 2013 08:18, YongQin Liu wrote:
> I Compiled it with the android-ndk-r8d with the attached build_native.sh
> script.
>
That's a gcc 4.7 right?
> * What platform are you testing on?
> The device I am testing on is an SP8810 device. here is the content of the
> cpuinfo
>
I believe that
