On 23 April 2013 13:16, Sugumar Natarajan wrote:
> I couldn’t find the arm-none-eabi- bare metal version of Linaro GCC 4.8.
> Please provide the link for prebuilt baremetal tool chain binaries?
arm-none-eabi- or aarch64-none-elf-? Linaro TCWG does not release
arm-none-eabi toolchain.
We are in
I couldn't find the arm-none-eabi- bare metal version of Linaro GCC 4.8. Please
provide the link for prebuilt baremetal tool chain binaries?
-Sugumar
-- IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are
confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended re
Hello,
On Wed, 17 Apr 2013 06:44:56 +0300
Paul Sokolovsky wrote:
[]
> But the problem we have is not that we can't get reliable *builds* in
> LAVA - it's that the *complete* CBuild picture doesn't work in LAVA.
> Benchmarks is a culprit specifically. If you want reliable builds,
> just use "lav
== Progress ==
* Disable-peeling: waiting for reference job results
* Libsanitizer:
- identified the reason for different behaviour on board and on simulator
- proposed a workaround on gcc-patches (qemu-user has a few
limitations, so it's desirable to skip some libsanitizer tests)
- in the m
== Progress ==
* Further work on glibc memcpy IFUNC patch based on review.
* Ported libdwarf to aarch64 and submitted upstream.
* Disabled gold build in binutils cbuild job and created a gold job.
* Investigated binutils testsuite failure on precise.
* On leave Friday.
== Issues ==
* None.
== P
== Progress ==
* Completed investigation of GDB dwarf test suite failures on ARM.
Almost all failures will be fixed with small updates to test cases
assembly language files.
* Checked-out GDB 7.6 branch and did comparison of dwarf test case failures
on arm. Some test cases have been updated alr
