Re: R_ARM_TLS_DTPMOD32 Relocation

2013-01-02 Thread Matthew Gretton-Dann
[gcc-help removed from CC as this is probably not a GCC issue.] On 31 December 2012 13:12, naveen yadav wrote: > Dear All, > > When doing prelink I got following error. > > /a.out > /a.out: R_ARM_TLS_DTPMOD32 reloc in executable? > > Gcc version 4.6 > > I have following question: > 1. What this r

R_ARM_TLS_DTPMOD32 Relocation

2013-01-02 Thread naveen yadav
Dear All, When doing prelink I got following error. /a.out /a.out: R_ARM_TLS_DTPMOD32 reloc in executable? Gcc version 4.6 I have following question: 1. What this relocation do. ? 2. Is it problem in tool chain ? 3. Are we need to fix this in Prelink utils Thanks _

Re: int64_t definition conflict on Aarch64

2013-01-02 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Monday 31 December 2012, Riku Voipio wrote: > It's not good enough - the __u64 and friends are used elsewhere in the > fuse code. However just pulling in linux/types.h as done in out OE > overlay is good enough: > > http://git.linaro.org/gitweb?p=openembedded/meta-aarch64.git;a=blob;f=recipes-s

Re: int64_t definition conflict on Aarch64

2013-01-02 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Wednesday 19 December 2012, Riku Voipio wrote: > Hi, > > The following code fails to build with OE Aarch64 toolchain with > current kernel headers. While ugly, the code is a reduced testcase > from fuse build failure ( > https://bugs.launchpad.net/linaro-oe/+bug/1087757 ) and the same fuse > co

Re: int64_t definition conflict on Aarch64

2013-01-02 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Thursday 27 December 2012, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Wednesday 19 December 2012, Riku Voipio wrote: > > Hi, > > > > The following code fails to build with OE Aarch64 toolchain with > > current kernel headers. While ugly, the code is a reduced testcase > > from fuse build failure ( > > https://b

Re: int64_t definition conflict on Aarch64

2013-01-02 Thread Riku Voipio
On 1 January 2013 16:55, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Monday 31 December 2012, Riku Voipio wrote: >> http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=CAAqcGH%3D-xM_a%3DR0o4cWoLqh7wKRLbiuHa_qPtrOBT2watYq_HA%40mail.gmail.com&forum_name=fuse-devel >> >> No response back yet, > The patch basical