Mans Rullgard wrote:
> On 28 October 2012 18:08, "Frank Müller" wrote:
> > For easier maintenance, we are now switching to Linaro. The image is set
> up and I can compile, however I notice a peculiar fact: the binary
> distribution of Linaro's gcc
> (https://launchpad.net/linaro-toolchain-binarie
On 29 October 2012 23:52, Bernhard Rosenkränzer
wrote:
> Hi,
> here's some patches for gcc-linaro to make it work with
> --host=arm-linux-androideabi
> They're the quick and dirty thing to do and look like they could have
> been written by Microsoft, needed something working in time for
> Connect
Hi,
here's some patches for gcc-linaro to make it work with
--host=arm-linux-androideabi
They're the quick and dirty thing to do and look like they could have
been written by Microsoft, needed something working in time for
Connect ;)
gcc-4.7-android-workarounds.patch: Workarounds for things that g
On 28 October 2012 18:08, "Frank Müller" wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> we have an ARM Cortex-A8 board where we are running our application. I am in
> charge of maintaining the Linux on it and the toolchain/SDK setup. So far
> we've been running Poky/OpenEmbedded and using the cross compiler that came
== Progress ==
* HOT/COLD partitioning for PGO
* Initial look at results
* Patch Tracking & Backporting
* Testing Doko's configury changes for arm-none-linux-gnueabihf support
* Connect Prep
* LRA Investigations
* Sign/zero extension II
== Next Week ==
* Linaro Connect
== Future
Summary:
* Validate and release Linaro binary toolchain 2012.10
* Test
Details:
1. Release Linaro binary toolchain 2012.10
* Fix windows installer issue due to version format change.
* Validate and release Linaro binary toolchain 2012.10.
2. Identify the root cause of PR 54902 (lp:1065559), an
