shrink-wrap.patch doesn't apply cleanly to the revision you suggest. If you
give a clean patch and some description of what happens I might be able to take
a look ..
What do you expect to happen with the testcases ? ICE ? wrong-code ,
wrong-debug info, what ?
Ramana
_
On 16 October 2012 11:44, Zhenqiang Chen wrote:
> On 16 October 2012 10:22, Ramana Radhakrishnan
> wrote:
>> Zhenqiang,
>>
>> I've been spending sometime scratching my head around this one tonight. Can
>> you show me the original shrink-wrap patch as well the test case that
>> triggers this fai
Zhenqiang,
I've been spending sometime scratching my head around this one tonight. Can you
show me the original shrink-wrap patch as well the test case that triggers this
failure ? I have my suspicion on something but need to run a few experiments
before commenting further.
regards,
Ramana
== other ==
* upstream patch review
* target-arm pull request
* reviewed/committed some boot wrapper patches from Tixy to init the CCI
* rebased various qemu kvm-related patches on current upstream master,
sent out RFC v2 for review (matching kernel -v12 patches); this is
getting some us
Hi Ramana,
The attached file is a reference patch to add more dwarf/unwind info
in epilogue. Please help to review.
Without the patch, dwarf check fail for the following cases when
enabling shrink-wrap:
tst ... L1 //simple_return
push ...
...
pop ... //.cfa_offset is not 0
L1:
