On Tuesday 10 April 2012 00:23:09 Jeff Law wrote:
> On 04/09/2012 10:19 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Monday 09 April 2012 15:47:56 Adam Conrad wrote:
> >> To be very, very, very clea here. multilib can not solve the "different
> >> base arches on one system problem". lib/lib32/lib64/libhf/lib
On 04/09/2012 10:19 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Monday 09 April 2012 15:47:56 Adam Conrad wrote:
are you not just as much hindering Debian over nothing more than a path to a
single file?
nope. sounds more like self inflicted pain.
To be very, very, very clea here. multilib can not solve t
On Monday 09 April 2012 15:47:56 Adam Conrad wrote:
> are you not just as much hindering Debian over nothing more than a path to a
> single file?
nope. sounds more like self inflicted pain.
> To be very, very, very clea here. multilib can not solve the "different
> base arches on one system pro
Hi there. The 2012.04 toolchain release is this week.
Ulrich, I see your fix for LP: #968766 has been approved upstream. In
theory it's too late but I'm happy to land it if you are. Could you
decide and let Andrew know by the middle of Tuesday? Andrew, if you
don't hear from Ulrich then spin a
On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 11:11:30PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Wednesday 04 April 2012 22:48:34 Wookey wrote:
> > Mike Frysinger [2012-04-02 19:56 -0400]:
>
> trying to paint the use of a triplet in the path as any other than multiarch
> is bunk. as Joseph explained in detail, there alread
