Re: Armhf dynamic linker path

2012-03-31 Thread Dennis Gilmore
On Sat, 31 Mar 2012 12:04:20 -0400 Jon Masters wrote: > On 03/31/2012 10:42 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > > > I can say for Fedora that we have no plans to adopt that change. > > AFAIK we never agreed to do so infact this is the first ive heard > > of it, we have moved everything from /bin /lib /

Re: Armhf dynamic linker path

2012-03-31 Thread Jon Masters
On 03/31/2012 12:04 PM, Jon Masters wrote: > On 03/31/2012 10:42 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > >> I can say for Fedora that we have no plans to adopt that change. AFAIK >> we never agreed to do so infact this is the first ive heard of it, we >> have moved everything from /bin /lib /lib64 to under /

Re: Armhf dynamic linker path

2012-03-31 Thread Jon Masters
On 03/31/2012 10:42 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > I can say for Fedora that we have no plans to adopt that change. AFAIK > we never agreed to do so infact this is the first ive heard of it, we > have moved everything from /bin /lib /lib64 to under /usr in Fedora 17. > we do have symlinks to the ori

Re: Armhf dynamic linker path

2012-03-31 Thread Jon Masters
On 03/31/2012 12:52 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > Linaro Connect and other events are probably the worst place for such > decisions and discussions to be made. So the purpose of discussing it there was twofold: 1). To debate what the preferred single unified path would be - it's ARM specific, it m

[ACTIVITY] Mar 26 - Mar 30

2012-03-31 Thread Ulrich Weigand
== GCC == * Committed fix for LP #960283 (PR tree-optimization/52686) to FSF mainline as well as Linaro GCC 4.6 and 4.7. * Worked on patch to use vld1.64/vst1.64 instead of vldm/vstm for vector moves. Created merge request for testing. * Worked on patch to use vld1/vst1 to implement v

Re: Armhf dynamic linker path

2012-03-31 Thread Dennis Gilmore
On Sat, 31 Mar 2012 11:34:13 +0100 Steve McIntyre wrote: > Hi folks, > > We really need to push on with getting the loader path for armhf > standardised. The path that was agreed months ago is > > /lib/arm-linux-gnueabihf/ld-linux.so.3 > > but clearly not everybody is using that yet. Dann has

Armhf dynamic linker path

2012-03-31 Thread Steve McIntyre
Hi folks, We really need to push on with getting the loader path for armhf standardised. The path that was agreed months ago is /lib/arm-linux-gnueabihf/ld-linux.so.3 but clearly not everybody is using that yet. Dann has just posted an updated patch for gcc, and we want to get this reviewed / f

[Activity] Week 13

2012-03-31 Thread Zhenqiang Chen
Summary: * Linaro binary toolchain 2012.03 release. * Investigate relocatable NLS support. * Code size benchmark analysis. Details: 1. Linaro binary toolchain 2012.03 release. * Bump and spawn 2012.02-20120326 build. * Validate the release candidate. * Update wiki for binary build tasks. 2.