On 27 March 2012 00:50, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
>
> Hi Michael,
>
> I'm seeing what looks like bogus testsuite failures again:
> https://code.launchpad.net/~uweigand/gcc-linaro/lp-960283-4.7/+merge/99069
>
> I suspect this is still caused by the .ident version string, which now
> appears to be:
> [g
== Progress ===
* Off sick for 4 days last week.
* Looked at the results for the vfp writeback modes and caught up with
some analysis on the one day I did work.
=== Plans ===
* Catch up on email after absences.
* Catch up on patches backlog
Absences.
* Apr 12-13 : Euro-LLVM London.
* 1 week ho
Hi Michael,
I'm seeing what looks like bogus testsuite failures again:
https://code.launchpad.net/~uweigand/gcc-linaro/lp-960283-4.7/+merge/99069
I suspect this is still caused by the .ident version string, which now
appears to be:
[gcc-linaro/~uweigand revision 114974]
While it no longer conta
* Linaro GCC
Applied my ARM conditional-execution and thumb 16-bit instruction size
optimization patch to upstream and Linaro 4.7.
Continued work on (slowly) working the bugs out of my 64-bit NEON
patches. Figuring out bootstrap failures is not easy! Eventually
discovered that:
* the NEO
