I've create a blueprint covering the basic functions in libav that are
implemented as inline assembly:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/gcc-linaro/+spec/investigate-libav-inline-assembly
These are a mix of multiplies, clipping, byte swap, and unaligned
access. We do OK on half of them but at le
I've created blueprints for the libav missed optimisations and added
references to Ramana's page at:
https://wiki.linaro.org/RamanaRadhakrishnan/Sandbox/RRQ112ConnectLibavgcc46Reg
Those that are new and in progress I've assigned to the relevant
person. Ulrich, I couldn't find a end of loop count
On 21 March 2012 08:12, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 18.03.2012 23:21, Michael Hope wrote:
>>
>> This is the first announcement on upcoming changes to the supported
>> Linaro GCC versions.
>>
>> GCC 4.7 is expected out in the next two weeks. We plan to switch to
>> 4.7 for the Linaro GCC 2012.04 re
On 18.03.2012 23:21, Michael Hope wrote:
This is the first announcement on upcoming changes to the supported
Linaro GCC versions.
GCC 4.7 is expected out in the next two weeks. We plan to switch to
4.7 for the Linaro GCC 2012.04 release and, as part of that, will put
Linaro GCC 4.6 into mainten
Hi,
OpenEmbedded:
* rebased against current OE-core
* my patch that introduces an image fs alignment is now upstream
* noticed that the newly introduced bdwgc recipe (the Hans Boehm
Garbage collector which is needed by guile) uses a version of libatomic
that fails when building in Thumb mode
On 03/13/2012 04:14 AM, Michael Hope wrote:
Hi Ken. I've made a meta-linaro project on Launchpad and created the
near term blueprints. See:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/meta-linaro
Hi Michael,
The blueprints are looking good to me - thanks. As for the priorities -
I think it would be
