Hi,
Sure, I can kick-off runs for these lower levels today.
Regards
Åsa
On 24 January 2012 01:29, Michael Hope wrote:
> Ken, Åsa: could you add a -O0 and -O1 build to the size and benchmark
> results? I'm looking at the writeup and it would be interesting to
> contrast the speed/size of -O0 wi
Ken, Åsa: could you add a -O0 and -O1 build to the size and benchmark
results? I'm looking at the writeup and it would be interesting to
contrast the speed/size of -O0 with -O2.
Ta,
-- Michael
___
linaro-toolchain mailing list
linaro-toolchain@lists.l
Spotted this in a Phoronix article today:
Overall it seems that most of the computational tests are performing
better with the newer Ubuntu 11.10 and 12.04 user-space packages,
which upgrades the GNU Compiler Collection to the 4.6 series over
the 4.5 release found in Ubuntu 11.04.
Hi,
I am looking at ticket 739305 "[armhf] libffi variadic support"
which still has status "New" for Linaro gcc.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libffi/+bug/739305
If I understand correctly, David's patch is included in libffi in Oneiric,
but not yet backported to Linaro gcc?
What is
https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/ToolChain/Meetings/2012-01-24
do folks have anything to add to this ?
Ramana
___
linaro-toolchain mailing list
linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain
* Linaro
Continued work on 64-bit multiplies. Cleaned up the patches a lot.
Started testing work to check for correctness. Ironed out a few bugs.
My turn for patch review week.
* Other
Spent most of the week in San Diego attending the formerly-known-as
CodeSourcery annual meeting, now Men
Mostly bug hunting week with some time on Partial partial PRE.
==Progress===
* Fixed PR50313 - backport submitted to Linaro 4.6 branch for testing
- Testing on FSF GCC 4.6 branch as well currently.
* Followed up on PR48308 fix . No reply yet.
* Triaged some of the test failures that we are cur
