+++ Loïc Minier [2011-11-10 17:44 +0100]:
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2011, Chung-Lin Tang wrote:
> > I'd assume the Ubuntu-packaged toolchain probably doesn't have a ARMv5
> > multilib? You could either expand the toolchain configuration and
> > rebuild, or more simply, use a CodeSourcery toolchain. Our def
On 10 Nov 2011, at 23:47, "Loïc Minier" wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2011, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
>> You can't rely on finding it. Executable images are only required to
>> have segment headers an d the attributes system uses section headers.
>> Section headers can be removed when an image gets st
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
> You can't rely on finding it. Executable images are only required to
> have segment headers an d the attributes system uses section headers.
> Section headers can be removed when an image gets stripped.
but if I have it during the u-boot build, it'
You can't rely on finding it. Executable images are only required to have
segment headers an d the attributes system uses section headers. Section
headers can be removed when an image gets stripped.
On 10 Nov 2011, at 16:46, "Loïc Minier"
mailto:loic.min...@linaro.org>> wrote:
On Thu, Nov
On 10 November 2011 11:50, Peter Maydell wrote:
> The Linaro Toolchain Working Group is pleased to announce the
> release of Linaro QEMU 2011.11.
The following item was accidentally omitted from the "Known Issues"
list in this announcement:
- This release of qemu-linaro is known not to work on A
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
> The build attributes were never intended to be used in executables; the
> format is too expensive to decode in most situations. Instead the ABI
> specification included an optional PHEADER that had a highly simplified
> indication of the executable c
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011, Chung-Lin Tang wrote:
> I'd assume the Ubuntu-packaged toolchain probably doesn't have a ARMv5
> multilib? You could either expand the toolchain configuration and
> rebuild, or more simply, use a CodeSourcery toolchain. Our default
> multilib is ARMv5TE.
Sorry, I didn't make
On 10/11/11 10:04, Loïc Minier wrote:
> Hey
>
> When building u-boot for an ARMv5T platform (versatileqemu_config), the
> Ubuntu-packaged Linaro cross-toolchain isn't suitable because it
> only offers an ARMv7T2 libgcc. But I'd like the build to fail when
> that happens rather than sil
Hi,
- SLP improvements for weight-h264-pixels16x16-8 (libav):
- conditions in SLP - committed upstream
- support pattern detection in SLP - implemented
- enhance mixed condition pattern to handle non-constant then/else
clauses - implemented
weight-h264-pixels16x16-8 now gets vectorize
The Linaro Toolchain Working Group is pleased to announce the
release of Linaro QEMU 2011.11.
Linaro QEMU 2011.11 is the latest monthly release of
qemu-linaro. Based off upstream (trunk) QEMU, it includes a
number of ARM-focused bug fixes and enhancements.
New in this month's release:
- The ARM
On 2011/11/10 06:04 PM, Loïc Minier wrote:
> When building u-boot for an ARMv5T platform (versatileqemu_config), the
> Ubuntu-packaged Linaro cross-toolchain isn't suitable because it
> only offers an ARMv7T2 libgcc. But I'd like the build to fail when
> that happens rather than silently genera
Hey
When building u-boot for an ARMv5T platform (versatileqemu_config), the
Ubuntu-packaged Linaro cross-toolchain isn't suitable because it
only offers an ARMv7T2 libgcc. But I'd like the build to fail when
that happens rather than silently generating an u-boot.bin which will
trigge
12 matches
Mail list logo
