Re: limits-fndefn.c and timeouts

2011-10-17 Thread Michael Hope
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 1:03 AM, Ulrich Weigand wrote: > Michael Hope wrote: > >> Separately, does this show a performance problem with var tracking? >> Turning on var tracking leads to a 20 x slow down in this particular >> case. > > I'd agree that is a performance problem; probably some nonline

[ACTIVITY] Weekly status

2011-10-17 Thread Richard Sandiford
== Last week and today == * Backported fix for returning std::pair. Unfortunately this showed up a regression on 4.5. I couldn't reproduce it cross, and the testcase itself looks innocuous, so I'm wondering whether the patch might trigger a miscompilation of cc1plus. * Committed SMS regis

[ACTIVITY] 10th - 14th October

2011-10-17 Thread Andrew Stubbs
Completed the 4.5 and 4.6 FSF to Linaro merges. Spun the Linaro GCC release tarballs, uploaded them to the test farm, and set off the test builds. Continued looking at the constant reuse optimization. This time I've build GCC itself with the new pass to see how many optimization opportunitie

[Activity] Week ending 14th October 2011

2011-10-17 Thread Ramana Radhakrishnan
==Progress=== * Some patch review. * Spent time looking at LP 836588. * Tried some different approaches for the vcvt.f64.s32 case and it looks like the simple solution is the best one unfortunately :( * 2 days off at internal training course. === Plans === * continue looking into LP 836588