On Mon, 4 Jul 2011, Michael Hope wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 4:15 PM, Michael Hope wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 9:03 AM, Nicolas Pitre
> > wrote:
> >> Hello Michael,
> >>
> >> We do have more and more instances of the following issues turning up in
> >> the kernel requiring toolchain
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 4:15 PM, Michael Hope wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 9:03 AM, Nicolas Pitre
> wrote:
>> Hello Michael,
>>
>> We do have more and more instances of the following issues turning up in
>> the kernel requiring toolchain assistance to solve the problem properly.
>> Could you
On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 8:39 AM, Karel Gardas wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I'm interested in LLVM correct performance on ARM hardware and it looks like
> LLVM is kind of sensitive to what GCC version is used for its compilation. I
> tested LLVM 2.9 as a reference point and LLVM
> HEAD as of June 29 on ARM
Hello,
I'm interested in LLVM correct performance on ARM hardware and it looks
like LLVM is kind of sensitive to what GCC version is used for its
compilation. I tested LLVM 2.9 as a reference point and LLVM
HEAD as of June 29 on ARMv7 (two boards with two different Ubuntu
versions) compiled b
Hi,
* continued to look into how to add remote support for libunwind using
ptrace
* reworked the lookup of the ARM specific unwind tables for local
unwinding
* re-use the existent (dwarf related) infrastructure to find the ARM
specific unwind tables rather than doing it on our own
* r
